{"id":17170,"date":"2014-05-21T01:38:50","date_gmt":"2014-05-20T23:38:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/?p=17170"},"modified":"2014-05-21T16:27:14","modified_gmt":"2014-05-21T14:27:14","slug":"what-the-credit-suisse-guilty-plea-means","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/what-the-credit-suisse-guilty-plea-means\/","title":{"rendered":"What the Credit Suisse Guilty Plea Means"},"content":{"rendered":"

Our correspondent Andreas Frank is an expert on shadow banking and Credit Suisse. \u00a0His most recent report can be found here.<\/a><\/p>\n

Here is his most recent report and documentation. \u00a0Mr. Frank writes:<\/p>\n

In a sign that banking giants are no longer immune from criminal charges, despite concerns that financial institutions have grown so large and interconnected that they are too big to jail, federal prosecutors demanded that Credit Suisse\u2019s parent company plead guilty to helping thousands of American account holders hide their wealth.<\/p>\n

As part of a deal with the Justice Department, the Swiss bank met the demands, agreeing to one count of conspiring to aid tax evasion in a scheme that \u201cspanned decades.\u201d Credit Suisse, which has a giant investment bank in New York and whose chief executive is an American, will also pay about $2.6 billion in penalties and hire an independent monitor for up to two years.<\/p>\n

The rebuke from federal prosecutors as well as from the Federal Reserve and New York\u2019s state banking regulator, Benjamin M. Lawsky, is intended as a blow against overseas tax dodging and the shadowy world of Swiss bank secrecy. The deal also signals a shift in prosecutors\u2019 tactics. It is the most prominent bank to plead guilty in the United States since Drexel Burnham Lambert in 1989, and the largest to do so since the Bankers Trust in 1999, a bank a fraction the size of Credit Suisse.<\/p>\n

Credit Suisse has done what no other bank of its size and significance has done in over two decades: plead guilty to criminal wrongdoing.<\/p>\n

For Credit Suisse, other than the fines and the reputational stain of being a felon, the implications are likely to be limited. The bank may lose some clients but is otherwise expected to survive largely unscathed. The plea deal also enables it to move beyond a case that had prompted a congressional hearing and had thrust the bank into an international squabble over tax dodging. If the bank had continued to fight the case, it would have been indicted, calling into question its very existence.<\/p>\n

\"Credit<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Our correspondent Andreas Frank is an expert on shadow banking and Credit Suisse. \u00a0His most recent report can be found here. Here is his most recent report and documentation. \u00a0Mr. Frank writes: In a sign that banking giants are no … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corruption","category-finance"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t