The Philadelphia Federal Reserve reports: \u00a0Over the past two decades, research in this field has particularly surged. \u00a0Substantial data is now available to better study these questions. It also surely has some connection to the growth of the knowledge economy, the fascination with Silicon Valley and related clusters, and similar popular themes. Particularly encouraging is the extensive set of connections being made from economic geography to adjacent fields such as labor economics, entrepreneurial finance, and business management.<\/p>\n
Much, however, remains to be accomplished. With the handful of important exceptions reviewed previously, we still have not opened the black box of how clusters operate. \u00a0Better empirical guidance about the microinteractions within clusters with respect to innovation will allow us to differentiate among models and build stronger theoretical frameworks. Fortunately, the data are within reach to do so. Many employer\u2013employee data sets are being linked to information on innovation (e.g., inventor identifiers), and these data sets often allow precise spatial coordinates of firms. This should prove a powerful lever for seeing further inside local areas, and it is likely that the line of work will increasingly draw upon network theory.<\/p>\n
We also need better insight into the long-term nature of agglomeration and innovation\u2014the life cycles of innovative places. This is true within countries\u2014innovation cores have shifted between Detroit, Boston, Silicon Valley, etc., and will continue to do so\u2014but also true across countries. How does the rise of Bangalore impact Boston? Does the development of global innovation centers in rapidly emerging countries complement or substitute for those in advanced economies? The study of agglomeration and innovation is exciting because we are starting to make some progress at understanding the local and global nature of these phenomena.<\/p>\n
What can local policymakers do to foster agglomeration and innovation in their cities. This is a big and difficult question, and we are right to be cautious that we do not have all the answers. However, governments have spent billions of dollars on this, and many will continue to fund \u201cbe the next Silicon Valley\u201d initiatives. This is true in advanced economies, in nations currently looking to transition from resource-dependent to a knowledge-based economy, in developing countries looking to leapfrog growth stages, and everywhere in between. Economists must continue to provide insight on these critical matters, and ideally our insights will get sharper faster. \u00a0\u00a0Agglomeration and Innovation<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n \u00a0 The Philadelphia Federal Reserve reports: \u00a0Over the past two decades, research in this field has particularly surged. \u00a0Substantial data is now available to better study these questions. It also surely has some connection to the growth of the knowledge economy, … Continue reading ![\"Silicon](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Silicon-Alley-300x236.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"