Mohamed A, El-Erian writes: There were quite a few disconnects at th International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Among the most striking was the disparity between participants\u2019 interest in discussions of inequality and the ongoing lack of a formal action plan for governments to address it. This represents a profound failure of policy imagination \u2013 one that must urgently be addressed.<\/p>\n
There is good reason for the spike in interest. While inequality has decreased across countries, it has increased within them, in the advanced and developing worlds alike. The process has been driven by a combination of secular and structural issues \u2013 including the changing nature of technological advancement, the rise of \u201cwinner-take-all\u201d investment characteristics, and political systems favoring hte wealthy.<\/p>\n
In the developed world, the problem is rooted in unprecedented political polarization, which has impeded comprehensive responses and placed an excessive policy burden on central banks. Though monetary authorities enjoy more political autonomy than other policymaking bodies, they lack the needed tools to address effectively the challenges that their countries face.\u00a0 Mohamed El-Erian writes: \u00a0 Among the most striking disconnect at the recent annual meetings of the IMF and the World Bank was the disparity between participants\u2019 interest in discussions of inequality and the ongoing lack of a formal action plan for governments to address it.<\/p>\n
While inequality has decreased across countries, it has increased within them, in the advanced and developing worlds alike. The process has been driven by a combination of secular and structural issues \u2013 including the changing nature of technological advancement, the rise of \u201cwinner-take-all\u201d investment characteristics, and political systems that favor the wealthy.<\/p>\n
In the developed world, the problem is rooted in unprecedented political polarization, which has impeded comprehensive responses and placed an excessive policy burden on central banks. Though monetary authorities enjoy more political autonomy than other policymaking bodies, they lack the needed tools to address effectively the challenges that their countries face.<\/p>\n
In normal times, fiscal policy would support monetary policy, including by playing a redistributive role. But these are not normal times. With political gridlock blocking an appropriate fiscal response \u2013 after 2008, the United States Congress did not pass an annual budget, a basic component of responsible economic governance, for five years \u2013 central banks have been forced to bolster economies artificially. To do so, they have relied on near-zero interest rates and unconventional measures like quantitative easing to stimulate growth and job creation.<\/p>\n
Beyond being incomplete, this approach implicitly favors the wealthy, who hold a disproportionately large share of financial assets.<\/p>\n
As a result, most countries face a trio of inequalities \u2013 of income, wealth, and opportunity \u2013 which, left unchecked, reinforce one another, with far-reaching consequences. Indeed, beyond this trio\u2019s moral, social, and political implications lies a serious economic concern: instead of creating incentives for hard work and innovation, inequality begins to undermine economic dynamism, investment, employment, and prosperity.<\/p>\n
Given that affluent households spend a smaller share of their incomes and wealth, greater inequality translates into lower overall consumption..<\/p>\n
It is time for heightened global attention to inequality to translate into concerted action. Some initiatives would tackle inequality directly; others would defuse some of the forces that drive it. Together, they would go a long way toward mitigating a serious impediment to the economic and social wellbeing of current and future generations.\u00a0 The Inequality Trifecta<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Mohamed A, El-Erian writes: There were quite a few disconnects at th International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Among the most striking was the disparity between participants\u2019 interest in discussions of inequality and the ongoing lack of a formal action … Continue reading ![\"Inequality\"](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/10\/Inequality-300x209.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n