Mike Spence writes:\u00a0 Chinese President Xi Jinping\u2019s massive anti-corruption campaign has advanced a number of key objectives: It has gone a long way toward restoring confidence in the Communist Party\u2019s commitment to a merit-based system; countered a decades-old pattern of public-sector domination; reduced the power of vested interests to block reform; and bolstered Xi\u2019s popularity among private-sector actors, if far less so with the bureaucracy.<\/p>\n
In short, Xi\u2019s effort to root out corruption has empowered both the Party and the reformers. The question is how far they will take their reform ambitions.\u00a0 Xi is certainly not finished yet, having outlined a set of legal reforms at last month\u2019s Fourth Plenum of the Communist Party aimed at creating a more level playing field for the public and private sectors. If implemented properly, the reforms will create a more efficient system for the creation and enforcement of contracts, ease the path for market entrants, and strengthen the application of China\u2019s competition laws.<\/p>\n
Greater fidelity to the rule of law will also lead to the creation of a legal and financial infrastructure that reduces fraud in the private sector, including in financial reporting. That, together with increased access to capital, will help to accelerate the development of the services sector, which is needed to create urban employment.\u00a0 Better management of China\u2019s considerable public assets \u2013 which include $3.5-4 trillion of foreign-exchange reserves, substantial land holdings, and majority ownership of the state-owned enterprises that dominate the economy \u2013 would complement these efforts. Indeed, it could help to boost competition, encourage innovation, strengthen the financial system, and expand access to capital.
\nThe question is how China could achieve this. As it stands, China\u2019s economy follows, to some extent, the old Leninist \u201ccommanding heights\u201d model, with the Party holding all political power and controlling major enterprises and sectors, even as the burgeoning private sector drives growth and employment. In this context, the kind of \u201cmeritocratic professionalism\u201d that China is pursuing is important; but it is no substitute for genuine competition in the public or private sector \u2013 at least not if innovation and structural change are the goals.<\/p>\n
Will Xi could simply declare that China\u2019s version of state capitalism has worked well in the past, and will continue to do so. But experience with the microeconomic dynamics of advanced economies (where China is headed) makes this a weak stance \u2013 and, thus, one that Xi is unlikely to take.\u00a0 The alternative would be to embark on a sustained program of privatization to shrink the asset side of the state\u2019s huge balance sheet. But China\u2019s balance sheet has served it well, enabling the extraordinarily high rates of investment that have fueled rapid growth. Meanwhile, many advanced economies have suffered considerably from their balance-sheet composition, with limited, poorly measured assets and outsize debt and non-debt liabilities.\u00a0\u00a0 Xi Going Forward<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Mike Spence writes:\u00a0 Chinese President Xi Jinping\u2019s massive anti-corruption campaign has advanced a number of key objectives: It has gone a long way toward restoring confidence in the Communist Party\u2019s commitment to a merit-based system; countered a decades-old pattern of … Continue reading ![\"Xi](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/11\/Xi-Going-Forward-300x169.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"