John Bruton writes:\u00a0 Change the EU treaty rules on debts and deficits, but don\u2019t bend them.<\/p>\n
The European Union (EU) is a group of sovereign states, each entirely free to leave the EU. There is no coercive force to make Britain or any other country remain in the union. Britain enjoys a freedom, within the EU, that colonies did not enjoy within the British or other European empires. Britain is, therefore, entirely within its rights in considering the option of leaving the EU.<\/p>\n
The EU does not exist on the basis of coercion. It exists on the basis of common rules or treaties that EU members have so far freely abided by, even when particular decisions were not to their liking. If countries started systematically ignoring EU decisions, the union would\u00a0 soon disappear.<\/p>\n
One particularly important set of EU rules are the ones that apply to budget deficits and debts of EU countries within the eurozone. These rules have been incorporated in EU treaties and in treaties between euro area states. One provision is that if a country has an excessive deficit, it must reduce that by an amount equivalent to 0.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) each year until it reaches a deficit below 3%.<\/p>\n
France and Italy, big states that were founding members of the EU, have both produced budgets for 2015 that do not comply with the rules.\u00a0 Some will argue it\u2019s the rules that are at fault, not France and Italy. Inflation is negative, so debts increase in value while prices fall.<\/p>\n
Countries are caught in a debt deflation trap of a kind that was not envisaged when the rules were drawn up. But that is an argument for changing the rules, not an argument for ignoring them or pretending they have been complied with, when they haven\u2019t.<\/p>\n
Changing the rules would require EU treaty change, and nobody wants to change the treaties, because such a move would have to be unanimously agreed upon by all 28 EU states. Other EU members fear that would be an opportunity for Britain to use the lever of blocking a treaty change to revise the fiscal rules as a means of getting a concession of British demands for: a restriction of free movement of people within the EU; vetoes for a minority of national parliaments on EU legislation; and the scrapping of the \u201cever closer union\u201d within the EU.<\/p>\n
If the EU is unable to change its treaties the union will eventually die. Daniel Gros, of the Centre for European Policy Studies, criticized the European Commission of Jean Claude Juncker for failing to either insist that France and Italy stick by the existing fiscal rules or, if not, call for a revision of the rules to take account of the exceptional deflationary conditions that exist.<\/p>\n
Don’t bend the rules.\u00a0 Change them.<\/p>\n
John Bruton writes:\u00a0 Change the EU treaty rules on debts and deficits, but don\u2019t bend them. The European Union (EU) is a group of sovereign states, each entirely free to leave the EU. There is no coercive force to make … Continue reading ![\"The](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/The-Price-of-European-Union-300x218.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"