Ramesh Ponnuru writes:\u00a0 Democrats have a knack for stumbling into trouble with mothers who aren’t in the paid labor force.<\/p>\n
In the late 1990s, Senator Chris Dodd said that being a full-time homemaker was a “wonderful luxury” for women who “want to go play golf or go to the club and play cards.” In 2012, Democrats said Ann Romney, who raised five sons, had “never worked a day in her life.” And a few months ago, President Obama suggested that for mothers to leave the labor force for a few years is “not a choice we want Americans to make.”<\/p>\n
Two of Obama’s new proposals reflect ‘mother’ blindness.\u00a0 Obama wants to triple the existing tax credit for child-care expenses, and create a new credit for second earners. Those proposals will help some parents and couples, but have nothing to offer families where one parent concentrates on home-based tasks.\u00a0The second-earner credit is probably too small to affect couples\u2019 decisions about work and child-care arrangements. So its main effect will be to lower the share of the tax burden paid by two-earner couples who were going to be working even without the credit.<\/p>\n
There are two standard economic justifications for shifting the tax burden in this way, neither of them convincing.<\/p>\n
One is that two-earner couples have higher costs than single-earner couples making the same income, so it’s harder for them to pay the same taxes.<\/p>\n
The second is\u00a0 that a progressive tax code, when applied to families rather than individuals, can penalize second earners. A second earner will often pay a higher tax rate than she would if she were single and making the same income, because she moves to a higher bracket when she marries a wage earner. The tax code thus discourages her from working. That’s true, but it’s just a special case of the way taxes discourage work, and not one that seems especially unjust or destructive. Marriage is (among other things) an economic partnership, and this feature of the tax code reflects that it involves pooling resources.<\/p>\n
If the second-earner credit ignores that feature of marriage, Obama’s other proposal ignores how little Americans like commercial child care.<\/p>\n
Given these preferences, it would make more sense to enlarge the child tax credit — not the child-care credit — and let parents use it as they see fit rather than requiring them to use the commercial day care most of them try to avoid.<\/p>\n
But as most homemakers could tell you, paid work isn’t everything.<\/p>\n
Ramesh Ponnuru writes:\u00a0 Democrats have a knack for stumbling into trouble with mothers who aren’t in the paid labor force. In the late 1990s, Senator Chris Dodd said that being a full-time homemaker was a “wonderful luxury” for women who … Continue reading ![\"Stay](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/01\/Stay-at-Home-Moms.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"