Jim O’Neill writes:\u00a0 The conventional wisdom about the state of the world economy goes something like this: Since the start of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the developed world has struggled to recover, with only the United States able to adjust. Emerging countries have fared better, but they, too, have started to flounder lately. In a bleak economic climate, the argument goes, the only winners have been the wealthy, resulting in skyrocketing inequality.<\/p>\n
This\u00a0 turns out to be completely wrong.<\/p>\n
Start with economic growth. According to the International Monetary Fund, during the first decade of this century, annual global growth averaged 3.7%, compared to 3.3% in the 1980s and 1990s. In the last four years, growth has averaged 3.4%.\u00a0 3.4% is hardly disastrous by historical standards.<\/p>\n
All of the large, developed economies are growing more slowly than they did when their economic engines were roaring. But it is only the eurozone that has badly disappointed in recent years., It has managed only a meager 0.3%.<\/p>\n
For Japan, the US, and the United Kingdom, the prospects are brighter. It should be relatively straightforward for them to grow at an average rate that outpaces that of the last decade.\u00a0 IMF\u2019s decision to downgrade its growth forecast for much of the world is baffling. If anything, with oil prices falling, an upward revision seems warranted.<\/p>\n
Another factor supporting a more positive outlook is the rebalancing that has occurred between the US and China, the world\u2019s two largest economies. Each entered the financial crisis with huge current-account imbalances. They are coming back into balance.<\/p>\n
It has recently become fashionable to disparage the economic performance of the large emerging countries, particularly China and the other BRIC economies (Brazil, Russia, and India). But it is hardly a surprise that these countries are no longer growing as fast as they once did.<\/p>\n
The only real disappointments are Brazil and Russia, both of which have struggled (again, not surprisingly) with much lower commodity prices.<\/p>\n
The conventional wisdom on wealth and inequality is similarly mistaken. From 2000 to 2014, global GDP more than doubled, from $31.8 trillion to over $75 trillion. Over the same period, China\u2019s nominal GDP soared from $1.2 trillion to more than $10 trillion \u2013 growing at more than four times the global rate.<\/p>\n
In 2000, the BRIC economies\u2019 combined size was about a quarter of US GDP. Today, they have nearly caught up, with a combined GDP of more than $16 trillion, just short of America\u2019s $17.4 trillion.<\/p>\n
Statistics like these utterly disprove the idea that global inequality is growing. Gaps in income and wealth may be shooting up within individual countries, but per capita income in developing countries is rising much faster than in the advanced economies. Indeed, that is why one of the key targets of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals \u2013 to halve the number of people living in absolute poverty \u2013 was achieved five years ahead of the deadline.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Jim O’Neill writes:\u00a0 The conventional wisdom about the state of the world economy goes something like this: Since the start of the 2007-2008 financial crisis, the developed world has struggled to recover, with only the United States able to adjust. … Continue reading ![\"State](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/State-of-the-World.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n