Open letter to the FInancial Times:<\/p>\n
Sir, The European Central Bank forecasts unemployment in the eurozone to remain at 10 per cent even after \u20ac1.1tn of quantitative easing. (FT View, March 25). This is hardly surprising: the evidence suggests that conventional QE is an unreliable tool for boosting GDP or employment.<\/p>\n
Bank of England research shows that it benefits the well-off, who gain from increasing asset prices, much more than the poorest. In the eurozone, where interest rates are at rock bottom and bond yields have already turned negative, injecting even more liquidity into the markets will do little to help the real economy.<\/p>\n
There is an alternative. Rather than being injected into the financial markets, the new money created by eurozone central banks could be used to finance government spending (such as investing in much needed infrastructure projects); alternatively each eurozone citizen could be given \u20ac175 per month, for 19 months, which they could use to pay down existing debts or spend as they please. By directly boosting spending and employment, either approach would be far more effective than the ECB\u2019s plans for conventional QE.<\/p>\n
The ECB will argue that this approach breaks the taboo of mixing monetary and fiscal policy. But traditional monetary policy no longer works. Failure to consider new approaches will unnecessarily prolong stagnation and high unemployment. It is time for the ECB and eurozone central banks to bypass the financial system and work with governments to inject newly created money directly into the real economy.<\/p>\n
\u00a0 Open letter to the FInancial Times: Sir, The European Central Bank forecasts unemployment in the eurozone to remain at 10 per cent even after \u20ac1.1tn of quantitative easing. (FT View, March 25). This is hardly surprising: the evidence suggests that … Continue reading ![\"Print](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/Print-Money.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"