Jean Pisani Ferry writes. \u00a0When Wolfgang Sch\u00e4uble, Germany\u2019s finance minister, recently tabled the option of a Greek exit from the euro, he wanted to signal that no member could abstain from the monetary union\u2019s strict disciplines. In fact, his initiative triggered a much broader discussion of the principles underpinning the euro, its governance, and the very rationale for its existence.<\/p>\n
The new dispute over Greece has convinced many policymakers of the necessity to return to the drawing board. Meanwhile, citizens wonder why they share this currency, whether it makes sense, and if agreement can be reached on its future.<\/p>\n
For currencies, as for countries, founding myths matter. The conventional wisdom is that the euro was the political price Germany paid for French acquiescence to its reunification. In fact, German reunification only provided the final impetus for a project conceived in the 1980s to resolve a longstanding dilemma. European governments were both strongly averse to floating exchange rates, which they assumed would be incompatible with a single market, and unwilling to perpetuate a Bundesbank-dominated monetary regime. A truly European currency built on German principles appeared to be the best way forward.<\/p>\n
In retrospect, German reunification was more a curse than a blessing. When exchange rates were locked in 1999, Germany\u2019s was overvalued, and its economy was struggling; France\u2019s was undervalued, and its economy was booming. During the ensuing decade, imbalances slowly grew between a resurgent Germany and countries where low interest rates had triggered credit booms. And when the global financial crisis erupted in 2008, conditions were ripe for a perfect storm.<\/p>\n
No one can say how Europe would have evolved without the euro. Would the fixed-exchange-rate system have endured or collapsed? Would the Deutschemark have been overvalued? Would states have reintroduced trade barriers, ending the single market? Would a real-estate bubble have developed in Spain? Would governments have reformed more or less?<\/p>\n
Establishing a counterfactual baseline against which the euro\u2019s impact could be assessed is impossible. But that is no excuse for complacency. Over the last 15 years, the eurozone\u2019s economic performance has been disappointing, and its policy system must answer for this.<\/p>\n
What really matters is whether a common European currency still makes sense for the future. This question is often evaded, because the cost of exiting is deemed too high to consider .How the EU Can Survive<\/strong><\/a> Jean Pisani Ferry writes. \u00a0When Wolfgang Sch\u00e4uble, Germany\u2019s finance minister, recently tabled the option of a Greek exit from the euro, he wanted to signal that no member could abstain from the monetary union\u2019s strict disciplines. In fact, his initiative … Continue reading
\n![\"Euro](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Euro-Repair-300x207.jpg\")
<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"