Jeffrey Frankel writes: \u00a0\u00a0World oil prices, which have been highly volatile during the last decade, have fallen more than 50% over the past year. The economic effects have been negative overall for oil-exporting countries, and positive for oil-importing countries.<\/p>\n
The answer is that countries should seek to do both: Lower the price paid to oil producers and<\/i> raise the price paid by oil consumers, by cutting subsidies for oil and refined products or raising taxes on them.<\/p>\n
Consider this: America\u2019s roads and bridges are crumbling, and the national transportation infrastructure requires investment and maintenance. And yet the US Congress shamefully continues to evade its responsibility to fund the Federal Highway Trust Fund and put it on a sound long-term basis, owing to disagreement over how to pay for it. The obvious solution, which economists have long advocated, is an increase in America\u2019s gasoline taxes. The federal gas tax has been stuck at 18.4 cents a gallon since 1993, the lowest among advanced countries. And yet, on July 30, Congress adopted only a three-month stopgap measure, kicking the gas can down the road for the 35th time since 2009.<\/p>\n
Fossil-fuel pricing is a striking exception to the general rule that if the government has only one policy instrument, it can achieve only one policy objective.\u00a0High oil consumption also leaves a country vulnerable to oil-market disruptions arising, for example, from instability in the Middle East. If gas taxes are high and consumption is low, as in Europe, fluctuations in the world price of oil have a smaller effect domestically.<\/p>\n
The conventional wisdom is that it is politically impossible in the US to increase the gas tax. But other countries have political constraints, too. Indeed, some developing-country governments have faced civil unrest, even coups, over fuel taxes or subsidies. Yet Egypt, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, and the United Arab Emirates have all reduced or abolished various fuel subsidies in the last year.<\/p>\n
Besides raising taxes on fuel consumption, the US should also stop some of its subsidies for oil production.<\/p>\n
For the US and other advanced countries, it is also a good time for reform from a macroeconomic standpoint. In the past, countries had to worry that a rising fuel tax could become built into uncomfortably high inflation rates. Currently, however, central bankers are not worried about inflation, except in the sense that they want it to be a little higher.<\/p>\n
The US Congress will have to come back to highway funding in September. If other countries have found that what was politically impossible has suddenly turned out to be possible, why not the US?<\/p>\n
Jeffrey Frankel writes: \u00a0\u00a0World oil prices, which have been highly volatile during the last decade, have fallen more than 50% over the past year. The economic effects have been negative overall for oil-exporting countries, and positive for oil-importing countries. The … Continue reading ![\"Price](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/08\/Price-of-Crude.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"