Joshka Fischer writes: Until a few weeks ago, Europeans believed they lived in a kind of sanctuary, insulated from the world\u2019s current conflicts. Certainly, the news and images of drowned migrants were dreadful; but the tragedy occurring south of Italy, Greece, and Malta, seemed a long way off.<\/p>\n
Syria\u2019s brutal civil war, which has been raging for years, seemed even farther away.<\/p>\n
So, sometime this summer, when the last glimmer of hope of a return to Syria disappeared and an alternative to Assad and the Islamic State no longer seemed realistic, these people started heading toward Europe, which seemed to promise a future of peace, freedom, and security. The refugees came via Turkey, Greece, and the Balkan states, or across the Mediterranean to escape similar chaos in Eritrea, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan.
\nIn August, thousands of refugees became stranded at Budapest\u2019s Keleti train station for days on end when Hungary\u2019s vexed and incompetent government deliberately allowed the situation to escalate.<\/p>\n
Eventually, thousands of men, women, and children \u2013 and even old and disabled people \u2013 started to make their way on foot toward the Austrian border. At this point Europe, witnessing an exodus of biblical proportions, could no longer ignore the challenge and the consequences of the crises in its neighboring region. Europe was now directly confronted with the harsh realities from which it had appeared to be a sanctuary.<\/p>\n
The European Union lacked the civilian, diplomatic, and military tools needed to contain, let alone resolve, the crises and conflicts in its neighborhood. And, once the migrants headed for Europe, the EU\u2019s common asylum policy failed, because the so-called Dublin III agreement provided no effective mechanism to distribute asylum-seekers among all members states after their initial registration in EU border states (in particular Greece and Italy). Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi\u2019s call for European solidarity went unheeded.<\/p>\n
Merkel took the brave and correct decision to let the refugees enter Germany. For this, she deserves wholehearted respect and full support, all the more so in view of the icy response of many within her own party. \u00a0But Merkel was not alone in embodying humane values at this decisive moment. Civil-society groups in Germany, Austria, and elsewhere mobilized to a hitherto unseen extent to meet \u2013 together with the public authorities \u2013 the enormous challenge posed by the influx. Without the public\u2019s active empathy, the authorities would never have managed. With the support of such ad hoc coalitions, Europe should do whatever it takes to ensure the refugees\u2019 successful integration.<\/p>\n
The influx launched during the \u201crefugee summer\u201d will change Germany and Europe. The EU will be able to address the challenge \u2013 and seize the opportunity \u2013 of integrating the newcomers only together and in the spirit of European solidarity. Should unity crumble in this crisis, the consequences for all parties involved \u2013 especially the refugees \u2013 will be grave.<\/p>\n
First and foremost, a new, effective system for securing Europe\u2019s external borders must be established as quickly as possible. This includes a joint procedure for judging asylum claims and a mechanism to distribute the refugees among EU countries fairly. Moreover, if the EU wants to maintain its core values, including the abolition of internal borders, it will need to focus on stabilizing its Middle Eastern, North African, and Eastern European neighbors with money, commitment, and all its hard and soft power. A united approach will be crucial.<\/p>\n
But Europe should avoid the kind of dismal realpolitik that would betray its core values elsewhere. It would be a grave mistake, for example, to sell out Ukraine\u2019s interests and lift the sanctions imposed on Russia out of the mistaken belief that the Kremlin\u2019s assistance is needed in Syria. Cooperation with Russia, however useful and advisable, must not come at the expense of third parties and Western interests and unity. Attempting to redeem past mistakes is not advisable when it means making even bigger ones.<\/p>\n
To be sure, there is a risk that the refugee crisis will strengthen nationalist and populist parties in EU member states. But the renationalization of politics within the EU gained traction long before the summer of 2015, and it is not a result of the refugee crisis. At its heart lies a fundamental conflict over Europe\u2019s future: back to a continent of nation-states, or forward to a community of shared values? Convinced Europeans will need to marshal all their strength \u2013 and muster all their nerve \u2013 in the times ahead.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Joshka Fischer writes: Until a few weeks ago, Europeans believed they lived in a kind of sanctuary, insulated from the world\u2019s current conflicts. Certainly, the news and images of drowned migrants were dreadful; but the tragedy occurring south of Italy, … Continue reading