As the European Union prepares to enter the new year, it faces an almost perfect storm of political challenges. The strategy it has used in the past \u2013 barely muddling through a series of calamities \u2013 may no longer be enough.<\/p>\n
Carl Bildt writes: \u00a0Of course, the EU is no stranger to crisis management. The euro crisis, for example, was widely expected to destroy the EU; but the issue was more or less handled. Greece remains in poor shape, but it has retained its EU and eurozone membership. And the EU now has stronger mechanisms for economic-policy coordination.<\/p>\n
But the situation today is far more demanding than anything the EU has seen so far \u2013 not least because of the sheer number of serious challenges that Europe faces. Far from the \u201cring of friends\u201d that EU leaders once envisioned, the European neighborhood has turned into a \u201cring of fire,\u201d fueled largely by the combination of Islamist terrorism and Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine.<\/p>\n
One of the challenges is the surging refugee crisis, fueled by conflict in the Middle East, especially Syria. To be sure, only a tiny fraction of those who have been displaced are currently seeking to enter the EU, and the million refugees expected to arrive this year represent only about 0.2% of the EU\u2019s population. But when so many arrive in so short a time in just a few countries, the EU\u2019s capacity to manage the influx has been overwhelmed, and controls at some borders within the Schengen Area have been restored.<\/p>\n
In 2016, EU countries can be expected to get a handle on the immediate challenge, agreeing to key steps to control borders and share the burden of migration more equitably. But the longer-term challenges \u2013 integrating the refugees into European society and countering the rise of xenophobic political parties \u2013 will be far more difficult.<\/p>\n
Progress on both the\u00a0Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership\u00a0and a single digital market are central to the EU global competitiveness. \u00a0A new \u201cglobal foreign and security strategy,\u201d to replace the one that was developed during the more optimistic days of 2003, must be in place by June.<\/p>\n
Danes have voted on whether to modify their country\u2019s opt-out on EU home and justice matters to an opt-in (which would allow Europe-wide rules to be adopted on a case-by-case basis). Very few predicted that the change would be rejected \u2013 and even fewer that it would be defeated so soundly, with 53% voting no.<\/p>\n
Dealing with the consequences of a UK exit would consume too much political oxygen in the succeeding years to address the myriad other challenges Europe faces.<\/p>\n
A year or two from now, the EU will look very different. It might be a fractured union, so preoccupied with arresting its breakdown, spurred by the UK\u2019s withdrawal, that it stumbles on virtually every other issue it faces. Or it could be a vigorous union that includes the UK and has gotten its act together on refugee, border, and asylum issues and is finalizing the TTIP and the digital single market.<\/p>\n
In this sense, whether the new year is a happy one for Europe may well determine whether the next decade is a happy one \u2013 both for Europe and those, including the United States, that depend on it.<\/p>\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
As the European Union prepares to enter the new year, it faces an almost perfect storm of political challenges. The strategy it has used in the past \u2013 barely muddling through a series of calamities \u2013 may no longer be … Continue reading