U.S. companies spend millions annually on diversity programs and policies. Mission statements and recruitment materials touting companies\u2019 commitment to diversity are ubiquitous. And many managers are tasked with the complex goal of \u201cmanaging diversity\u201d \u2013 which can mean anything from ensuring equal employment opportunity compliance, to instituting cultural sensitivity training programs, to focusing on the recruitment and retention of minorities and women.<\/p>\n
Are all of these efforts working? In terms of increasing demographic diversity, the answer appears to be not really. The most commonly used diversity programs do little to increase representation of minorities and women. A longitudinal study of over 700 U.S. companies found that implementing diversity training programs has little positive effect and may even decrease representation of black women.<\/p>\n
Most people assume that diversity policies make companies fairer for women and minorities, though the data suggest otherwise. Even when there is clear evidence of discrimination at a company, the presence of a diversity policy leads people to discount claims of unfair treatment. In previous research, we\u2019ve found that this is especially true for members of dominant groups and those who tend to believe that the system is generally fair.<\/p>\n
All this has a real effect in court. In a 2011 Supreme Court class action case, Walmart successfully used the mere presence of its anti-discrimination policy to defend itself against allegations of gender discrimination. And Walmart isn\u2019t alone: the \u201cdiversity defense\u201d often succeeds, making organizations less accountable for discriminatory practices.<\/p>\n
In a recent experiment, we found evidence that it not only makes white men believe that women and minorities are being treated fairly \u2014 whether that\u2019s true or not \u2014 it also makes them more likely to believe that they themselves are being treated unfairly.<\/p>\n
We put young white men through a hiring simulation for an entry-level job at a fictional technology firm. For half of the \u201capplicants,\u201d the firm\u2019s recruitment materials briefly mentioned its pro-diversity values. For the other half, the materials did not mention diversity. In all other ways, the firm was described identically. All of the applicants then underwent a standardized job interview while we videotaped their performance and measured their cardiovascular stress responses.<\/p>\n
Compared to white men interviewing at the company that did not mention diversity, white men interviewing for the pro-diversity company expected more unfair treatment and discrimination against whites. They also performed more poorly in the job interview, as judged by independent raters. And their cardiovascular responses during the interview revealed that they were more stressed.<\/p>\n
Thus, pro-diversity messages signaled to these white men that they might be undervalued and discriminated against.<\/p>\n
In another set of experiments, we found that diversity initiatives also seem to do little to convince minorities that companies will treat them more fairly.<\/p>\n
Groups that typically occupy positions of power may feel alienated and vulnerable when their company claims to value diversity. This may be one explanation for the lackluster success of most diversity management attempts.<\/p>\n
So what can managers do? First, they must appreciate the potential effect of diversity messages on groups that have traditionally been favored in organizations.<\/p>\n
Second, managers should know the limits of diversity initiatives for minorities and women. \u00a0They must be more than \u201ccolorful window dressing\u201d that unintentionally angers a substantial portion of the workforce. Diversity policies must be researched, assessed for effectiveness, and implemented with care so that everyone in the workplace can feel valued and supported.<\/p>\n
U.S. companies spend millions annually on diversity programs and policies. Mission statements and recruitment materials touting companies\u2019 commitment to diversity are ubiquitous. And many managers are tasked with the complex goal of \u201cmanaging diversity\u201d \u2013 which can mean anything from … Continue reading ![\"Diversity](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/01\/Diversity-and-Women.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"