Andrew Sheng-and Xiao Geng write: China\u2019s ability to maintain stability depends on a multitude of interrelated factors, such as low productivity growth, declining real interest rates, disruptive technologies, excess capacity and debt overhangs, and excess savings. In fact, the current battle over the renminbi\u2019s exchange rate reflects a tension between the interests of the \u201cfinancial engineers\u201d (such as the managers of dollar-based hedge funds) and the \u201creal engineers\u201d (Chinese policymakers).<\/p>\n
Foreign-exchange markets are, in theory, zero-sum games: the buyer\u2019s loss is the seller\u2019s gain, and vice versa.<\/p>\n
Nowadays, financial engineers increasingly shape the exchange rate through financial transactions that may not be linked to economic fundamentals. Because financial markets notoriously overshoot, if the short-sellers win by pushing exchange rates and the real economy into a low-level equilibrium, the losses take the form of investment, jobs, and income. In other words, financial engineers\u2019 gain is real people\u2019s pain.<\/p>\n
In order to achieve these gains, financial engineers use the media to influence market behavior.<\/p>\n
China\u2019s growth slowdown and the rise of non-performing loans are being discussed as exclusively negative developments. But they are also necessary pains on the path to supply-side reform aimed at eliminating excess capacity, improving resource efficiency, and jettisoning polluting industries.<\/p>\n
China\u2019s authorities have long understood that a stable renminbi exchange rate is critical to national, regional, and global stability. Indeed, that is why they did not devalue the renminbi during the Asian financial crisis. They saw what most analysts missed: leaving the US dollar as the main safe-haven currency for global savings, with near-zero interest rates, would have the same deflationary impact that the gold standard had in the 1930s.<\/p>\n
In the face of today\u2019s deflationary forces, however, real engineers in the world\u2019s major economies have been unwilling or unable to reflate. The United States, the world\u2019s largest economy, will not use fiscal tools to that end, owing to domestic political constraints. Europe\u2019s unwillingness to reflate reflects Germany\u2019s deep-seated fear of inflation (which underpins its enduring commitment to austerity). Japan cannot reflate because of its aging population and irresolute implementation of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe\u2019s economic plan, so-called Abenomics. And China is still paying for the excessive reflation caused by its CN\u00a54 trillion ($586 billion) stimulus package in 2009, which added over CN\u00a580 trillion to its own debt.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, the consequences of financial engineering are intensifying. Zero and negative interest rates have not only encouraged short-term speculation in asset markets and harmed long-term investments; they have also destroyed the business model of banks, insurance companies, and fund managers.<\/p>\n
Financial engineers outperformed the real economy only with the support of super-financial engineers \u2013 that is, central banks. Initially, balance-sheet expansion \u2013 by $5 trillion since 2009 \u2013 provided banks with the cheap funding they needed to avoid failure. But bank deleveraging (brought about by stiffer regulatory requirements), together with negative interest rates, caused financial institutions\u2019 equity prices to fall, leading to further pro-cyclical destruction of value through price deflation, increasing illiquidity, and crowded exits.<\/p>\n
Past experience has taught China\u2019s real engineers that the only way to escape deflation is through painful structural reforms \u2013 not easy money and competitive devaluation.<\/p>\n
The US dollar is a safe haven, but savers in need of liquidity still lack an impartial lender of last resort. Depositing in reserve currencies at near-zero interest rates makes sense only if the banker is not funding financial speculation against the depositor.<\/p>\n
China\u2019s G-20 presidency this year offers an important opportunity to emphasize that renminbi stability is important not only for China, but also for the global financial system as a whole. If the US dollar enters into another round of revaluation, the only winners will be financial engineers.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Andrew Sheng-and Xiao Geng write: China\u2019s ability to maintain stability depends on a multitude of interrelated factors, such as low productivity growth, declining real interest rates, disruptive technologies, excess capacity and debt overhangs, and excess savings. In fact, the current … Continue reading