Nouriel Roubini writes: \u00a0With most advanced economies experiencing anemic recoveries from the 2008 financial crisis, their central banks have been forced to move from conventional monetary policy \u2013 reducing policy rates via open-market purchases of short-term government bonds \u2013 to a range of unconventional policies. Although the zero nominal bound on interest rates \u2013 previously only a theoretical possibility \u2013 had been reached and zero-interest-rate policy (ZIRP) had been implemented, growth remained anemic. So central banks embraced measures that didn\u2019t even exist in their policy toolkit a decade ago. And now they are poised to do so again.<\/p>\n
The list of unconventional measures has been extensive.<\/p>\n
(1) Quantitative easing (QE), or purchases of long-term government bonds, once short-term rates were already zero.<\/p>\n
(2) Credit easing (CE), which took the form of central-bank purchases of private or semi-private assets \u2013 such as mortgage- and other asset-backed securities, covered bonds, corporate bonds, real-estate trust funds, and even equities via exchange-traded funds. The aim was to reduce private credit spreads (the difference between yields on private assets and those on government bonds of similar maturity) and to boost, directly and indirectly, the price of other risky assets such as equities and real estate.<\/p>\n
(3) \u201cForward guidance\u201d (FG), the commitment to keep policy rates at zero for longer than economic fundamentals justified, thereby further reducing shorter-term interest rates.<\/p>\n
These policies did indeed reduce long- and medium-term interest rates on government securities and mortgage bonds. They also<\/p>\n
(1) narrowed credit spreads on private assets \u00a0(2) boosted the stock market, (3) weakened the currency, and (4) reduced real interest rates by increasing inflation expectations.<\/p>\n
In most advanced economies, growth (and inflation) remained stubbornly low. There was no shortage of reasons for this. \u00a0Unconventional monetary policies could prevent severe recessions and outright deflation; but they could not bring about robust growth and 2% inflation.<\/p>\n
Structural policies are needed to increase potential growth and keep firms, households, banks, and government from turning into zombies, chronically unable to spend because of too much debt. And fiscal policies were also necessary to support aggregate demand.<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, the political economy of most structural reforms \u2013 with their front-loaded costs and back-loaded benefits \u2013 implies that they occur only slowly. At the same time, fiscal policy has been constrained in some countries by high deficits and debts (which jeopardize market access), and in others (the eurozone, the United Kingdom, and the United States, for example) by a political backlash against further fiscal stimulus, leading to austerity measures that undermine short-term growth.<\/p>\n
As a result, unconventional monetary policies \u2013 entrenched now for almost a decade \u2013 have themselves become conventional. And, in view of persistent lackluster growth and deflation risk in most advanced economies, monetary policymakers will have to continue their lonely fight with a new set of \u201cunconventional unconventional\u201d monetary policies.<\/p>\n
The next stage of unconventional unconventional monetary policy could have three components. \u00a0(1) Central banks could tax cash to prevent banks from attempting to avoid the negative-rate tax on excess reserves. With banks unable to switch into cash (thereby earning zero rates), (2) central banks could go even more negative with policy rates. \u00a0(3)\u00a0QE could evolve into a \u201chelicopter drop\u201d of money or direct monetary financing by central banks of larger fiscal deficits. Indeed, the recent market buzz has been about the benefits of permanent monetization of public deficits and debt. Moreover, while QE has benefited holders of financial assets by boosting the prices of stocks, bonds, and real estate, it has also fueled rising inequality. A helicopter drop (through tax cuts or transfers financed by newly printed money) would put money directly into the hands of households, boosting consumption. \u00a0(4) Credit easing by central banks, or purchases of private assets, could broaden significantly.<\/p>\n
If unconventional unconventional monetary policies sound a little crazy, it\u2019s worth remembering that the same was said about \u201cconventional unconventional\u201d policies just a few years ago. And if current conditions in the advanced economies remain entrenched a decade from now, helicopter drops, debt monetization, and taxation of cash may turn out to be the new QE, CE, FG, ZIRP, and NIRP. Desperate times call for desperate measures.<\/p>\n
Nouriel Roubini writes: \u00a0With most advanced economies experiencing anemic recoveries from the 2008 financial crisis, their central banks have been forced to move from conventional monetary policy \u2013 reducing policy rates via open-market purchases of short-term government bonds \u2013 to … Continue reading ![\"Desperate](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/04\/Desperate-Monetary-Measures.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"