Since 1979, roughly 150 lawsuits have been filed against American and foreign corporations for actions committed around the world. Four local plaintiffs used the ATS to sue Unocal in a federal court in Los Angeles for human-rights violations allegedly committed during the construction of an oil pipeline in Myanmar. A human-rights organisation used it to sue Yahoo on behalf of two Chinese democracy activists for actions committed in China by a subsidiary. ATS suits against DaimlerChrysler and Rio Tinto, among others, are pending. Though most ATS cases have been dismissed or settled, the costs of settlements can be high and the negative publicity damaging.<\/p>\n
Multinational companies will therefore cheer the Supreme Court\u2019s unanimous decision in\u00a0Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (Shell)<\/em>, released on April 17th. It dramatically limits the ability of plaintiffs to file suit against corporations in American courts for actions committed abroad. \u00a0Article<\/a><\/p>\n Since 1979, roughly 150 lawsuits have been filed against American and foreign corporations for actions committed around the world. Four local plaintiffs used the ATS to sue Unocal in a federal court in Los Angeles for human-rights violations allegedly committed … Continue reading ![\"OldShellGame\"](\"http:\/\/www.w-t-w.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/OldShellGame.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"