Encouraging Girls to Enter the Technology Field

Angela Merkel celebrate International Girls in ICT Day in Berlin before she left for Brussels.

International Girls in ICT Day is an opportunity for girls and young women to see and experience ICTs in a new light encouraging them to consider a future in technology. To date, over 111,000 girls and young women have taken part in more than 3,500 events held in 140 countries around the world.  Ghana, Lebanon, Brazil, et cetera!

The Girls in ICT initiative of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is a global effort to raise awareness on empowering and encouraging girls and young women to consider studies and careers in ICTs. The initiative is committed to celebrate and commemorate the International Girls in ICT Day on the fourth Thursday of every April as established by the ITU membership.

The Girls in ICT Portal is a tool for girls and young women to get an insight into the ICT sector as well as for partners to understand the importance of the International Girls in ICT Day, developed by the Digital Inclusion programme of ITU Telecommunication Development Bureau.

Girls in Tech

Renzi: End Slave Driving and Set up Immigration Centers in Africa

Dan Bilefsky writes: Prime Minister Matteo Renzi of Italy has issued a plea for collective action, and he alluded to a call for the creation of centers in Africa that would process asylum applications in a bid to spare many the perilous sea crossing to Europe.

Italy has become the main target of a wave of migrants trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea on often unseaworthy vessels such as the ship that capsized off the coast of Libya over the weekend, killing as many as 900 people.

Mr. Renzi called for the European Union to have a more coordinated strategy, including expanding search-and-rescue patrols and taking action against smugglers in Libya and elsewhere, whom he referred to as “21st-century slave drivers.”

He also evoked an idea that has previously circulated in Brussels: the establishment of migration centers in African countries, in cooperation with the United Nations, so that would-be migrants could apply for asylum in the European Union from their home countries rather than set off on potentially deadly journeys in search of refuge in Europe.On Thursday, European leaders are expected to discuss proposals to double the size of search-and-rescue operations in the Mediterranean; increase the budget for Frontex, the European Union’s border agency; improve cooperation between the police across the bloc; and intensify the battle against smugglers and human traffickers.

European Union officials said on Wednesday that the current budget for the bloc’s border protection operation, known as Triton, was about 3 million euros, or $3.2 million, a month, and that the operation’s resources included two aircraft, two helicopters, six coastal patrol vessels and about 65 officers. Even doubling that would probably not be enough to deal with the scale of the migration crisis, analysts said.

The number of people who have died in the Mediterranean Sea this year is thought to have already reached 1,727 migrants, according to the International Organization for Migration — more than 30 times last year’s death toll.

However, efforts to forge a common and robust European approach to immigration have faced several challenges in recent years, including weak political will at a time when budgets are stretched and far-right parties that have gained in popularity across the Continent by tapping into resentment against immigrants.

The efforts to forge a new European strategy on immigration have also been stymied by the fact that migration policy in the 28-member union is mostly the preserve of national governments rather than Brussels.

Issues for Hillary Clinton

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will announce her run for the presidency tomorrow.   Here are the words we are looking for:

Inequality

End Glass Steagall

Break up of banks

Education reform

Afforable housing for all

Diversion of public funds by corruptioin

Commodities trading

High speed trading

Inclusive foreign policy

Mrs. Clinton AnnouncesAdd to the list on twitter or below.

 

Estonia: Europe’s Largest Drug Problem?

The small baltic state had 190.8 drug-induced deaths per million of the population in 2012, more than double second placed Norway. The reason for Estonia’s high death rate is an overdose boom caused by fentanyl, a synthetic form of heroin produced clandestinely in neighbouring Russia. For more infographics about Europe, read more in Statista’s latest Independent feature.

This chart shows drug-induced deaths per million of the population in 2012.

Estonia- Europe's Biggest Drug Problem

US Lags in Numeracy Skills

On the human-capital side, in 1995 America had the highest graduation rate in the OECD. Now it lags behind seven other countries. President Barack Obama has set a target for his country to return to the top of the graduation league by 2020, but it is unlikely to be met. Young American graduates are below the OECD average in numeracy and literacy, and are doing relatively worse than older ones. Some of the explanation lies with the poor performance of America’s schools, but the most expensive tertiary-education system in the OECD might be expected to help students catch up.

Recent work by American academics suggests that it does not. Richard Arum of New York University and Josipa Roksa of the University of Virginia, authors of “Academically Adrift”, looked at the results of 2,300 students who took the Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA), a test of critical thinking, complex reasoning and writing, and found that 45% of the sample showed no significant gains between their first and third years. Innumeracy in America

American Education Failing

Do School Children Deserve Good Food, Well Prepared?

Lenny Bernstein writes: In schools where trained chefs jazzed up fare, children ate more fruits and vegetables–and the schools themselves saved money, according to a study released online Monday in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.

Getting them to drink plain milk instead of chocolate milk was a much bigger challenge, however.Researchers at Harvard University’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health studied the eating habits of more than 2,600 third- through eighth-graders in two low-income urban school districts. The vast majority of the children were Hispanic, and their average age was 11 1/2. Trained chefs were randomly assigned to some schools to spice up fruits, vegetables and entrees with low-fat, low-salt recipes. In some of the schools, the project also experimented with how the foods were presented to the children in the food line.The researchers weighed the quantities of food the kids took and their “plate waste,” the food left over when they were finished eating. (Monitors collected the food before children tossed it into the trash.)

Not surprisingly, when kids were offered sauteed broccoli in garlic and olive oil or vegetable soup instead of hideous piles of indistinguishable greens, they tended to eat more of the healthful food, said Juliana Cohen, a research associate in the school’s nutrition department.

“What this study is showing is that this is an effective method to reduce plate waste,” she said in an interview. Children “are going to like the foods and they’re going to eat the foods.”

[Why do we still eat this way?]

This is no small matter, because, as the study points out, 30 million children receive meals at school each day and many of them rely on those meals for as much as half their calories. When those calories come in the form of junk food, they contribute to the current condition of U.S. school-aged children, nearly a third of whom are overweight or obese, according to an editorial that accompanies the study.

“When choosing what to eat, children are particularly influenced by the environment in which food is presented,” the editorial notes. ” ‘Choice architecture’ is the application of behavioral economic principles to the design of environments in which decisions are made.”

The Obama administration, in particular first lady Michelle Obama, has made more healthful school lunches a priority, but this study was conducted before new standards went into effect. (A separate study by Cohen and others belied accounts that kids were rejecting more nutritious food because of its taste.)

[First lady vows again to fight delays in enforcing school lunch standards]

In the current study, researchers found that consumption of entrees didn’t change much, but that didn’t bother them, because chefs were substituting low fat, low salt and whole grain meals for less healthful alternatives. After three months, the children didn’t change their selection of fruits and vegetables prepared by chefs very much, but after seven months they did. They also chose more fruit in schools where it was presented prominently. When both approaches were tried, fruit and vegetable consumption improved.

“We didn’t see the increase in consumption immediately,” Cohen said. “Schools shouldn’t abandon healthy foods if students don’t instantly” take to it, she added.

The only failure of the experiment occurred when the researchers pushed plain milk by making it more obviously available, in an attempt to persuade children to choose it over chocolate milk. That just didn’t work, and Cohen said schools might have to consider removing the sugar-sweetened beverage from cafeterias if they want children to make that change.

When I asked her how any school district could afford a chef, Cohen said the move actually saved money for the ones in this study. In addition to their training in recipes and food presentation, chefs from restaurants and caterers brought their knowledge of more efficient use of food and inventory control to the school meal operation, trimming costs for the districts.

 Broccoli?

 

How to Learn

Leonid Bershidsky writes:  The London newspaper The Independent recently published a sensational story about Finnish plans to abandon subject teaching in public schools. No more math, history and geography as separate lessons, it reported. Instead, students will study topics such as the European Union, picking up language and math skills and knowledge about geography and history as they go along. Even though that’s not exactly what’s happening in Finland, the article took off on social networks. Apparently, adjustments to rigidly compartmentalized learning sound good to a lot of people.

The Finnish curriculum reform scheduled for next year does nothing so exciting as abolishing subjects. It does call on schools to introduce periods in which so called “phenomenon-based” interdisciplinary teaching will be done. In Helsinki, the capital, two such periods will be required during the year, each to last for several weeks. At many other schools, especially in the hinterland, the periods will probably amount to less, because teachers don’t believe in the newfangled methods or don’t understand how to use them.

Revolution is not the Finnish way, tinkering is. And that’s just what the Finns are doing with curriculum. The National Board of Education wondered why students are less satisfied with their school experience and why test results have been sliding: In 2003, Finnish students had the second highest scores of the 65 countries covered by the PISA testing program run by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, but by 2012 they were in 12th place. So the board came up with the idea of bringing the curriculum closer to phenomena that students are likely to encounter in real life. This is a variation on an old idea of John Dewey’s. In 1938, he wrote:

One trouble is that the subject-matter in question was learned in isolation; it was put, as it were, in a water-tight compartment. When the question is asked, then, what has become of it, where has it gone to, the right answer is that it is still there in the special compartment in which it was originally stowed away. If exactly the same conditions recurred as those under which it was acquired, it would also recur and be available. But it was segregated when it was acquired and hence is so disconnected from the rest of experience that it is not available under the actual conditions of life.

This is still true today. As Dewey noted, when we have to re-examine what we learned in school, we often wonder how much unlearning and re-learning we’ve since had to do. I remember my 10 years of Soviet school as a crushingly boring waste of time: Everything I know, I learned elsewhere.

Estonia, Finland’s neighbor, whose PISA scores are on their way up and whose pioneering e-government system Finland is now adopting, teaches schoolchildren how to code, build web pages and applications. Once they have the skills, they will pick up the knowledge they want as they apply them — and this won’t necessarily be the same knowledge that everyone needs to have.

People are more exciting, and their thinking is fresher, when they use similar skill sets to build widely divergent stocks of knowledge. That’s not something the new Finnish system is going to promote.

Perhaps the best aspect of the Finnish system is the freedom its schools have to form their own curricula within a loose national framework, and the freedom students have to determine how they want to learn. Experimentation can help develop alternatives to the traditional learning system we all remember, and don’t really want it for our kids.

Learning?

How to Pay for Global Education

Jeffrey Sachs:  Of all of the investments needed to achieve sustainable development, none is more important than a quality education for every child. In a knowledge-based world economy, a good education is vital for finding decent work; achieving good health; building functioning communities; developing the skills to be a dependable parent; and growing up to be an engaged and responsible citizen.

Indeed, it is no surprise that the most brutish and violent groups in the world, such as Nigeria’s Boko Haram, attack education. And it was right on the mark to award the 2014 Nobel Peace Prize to Malala Yousafzai, the Pakistani teenager shot by the Taliban for her brave advocacy of girls’ education.

When the world’s governments launch the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) this September, they will rightly put education for all children at the forefront, alongside ending extreme poverty, hunger, and death from preventable and treatable causes. Yet, while many poor countries have increased domestic financing for education, the international community has not yet done its part. Aid for education remains too low and too fragmented.

In advance of adopting the SDGs, at the Conference on Financing for Development in July, the world has the chance to put real resources behind the Education SDG. The three major types of partners convening in Addis Ababa – governments, philanthropists, and top companies – should pool resources to enable impoverished countries to scale up education, especially at the pre-K and secondary levels. The time has come to create a Global Fund for Education to ensure that even the world’s poorest children have the chance to receive a quality education at least through secondary school.

This is how malaria, AIDS, and vaccine-preventable diseases have been battled successfully in the past 15 years.

We must now do the same for education. Though access to primary schooling has expanded dramatically over the past two decades, a transformative breakthrough in quality learning and secondary education has remained out of reach – until now. The spread of computers, mobile phones, and broadband coverage to the poorest regions of the world could – and should – ensure that every child in low-income countries has access to the same trove of online information and quality learning materials as children in high-income countries.

Scaling up the use of information and communications technology (ICT), together with improved access to educational innovations, trained teachers and village education workers, and better measurement of learning outcomes, would enable low- and middle-income countries to create high-quality education systems within the next 15 years. In the meantime, students in impoverished rural schools that currently lack books, electricity, and trained teachers would be connected online – via solar panels and wireless broadband – to quality educational materials, free online courses, and other schools, thereby closing a resource gap that, until recently, seemed insurmountable.

The world even has the organizational leadership to make this possible. The Global Partnership for Education is a worldwide coalition of governments and NGOs that has been working for more than a decade with the world’s poorest countries to help them scale up quality education.

Yet, despite the GPE’s tremendous success in encouraging poor countries to mobilize their own budget resources to expand the reach and quality of their educational programs, rich countries have not adequately supported this effort by closing the financing gap these countries face. The GPE should be supported to help build a true Global Fund for Education to ensure that every low-income country that puts in place an effective national strategy and domestic financing would have international support to accomplish its goals.

That $40 billion might seem like a lot of money, but consider this: The world’s richest 80 people have an estimated net worth of around $2 trillion dollars. If they would devote just 1% of their net worth each year, they would cover half the global financial need.

The beauty of a new Global Fund for Education is that, once it got underway, it would quickly attract supporters from around the world. Arab governments would want to ensure that all Arabic-speaking children receive a decent ICT-backed education; Brazil and Portugal would surely contribute to ensure that Africa’s many Portuguese speakers benefit from scaled-up education systems. Innovative high-tech companies would scramble to put their learning tools in front of the world’s children. Local universities would train teachers and villagers on how to maximize the potential of these new technologies.

The stars – the SDGs, the ICT giants, mobile broadband, online learning, and philanthropists – are aligning for such a scenario. A Global Fund for Education, announced at the Conference on Financing for Development, would be the best news possible for today’s children everywhere and a dazzling inauguration for the SDGs.

Global Education

 

Turkey: Former First Lady Speaks out on Education

Riada Ašimović Akyol writes:   Hayrunnisa Gul, the former first lady of Turkey, speaks with unusual frankness about education.  Journalist Ahu Ozyurt wrote, “Mrs. Hayrunnisa Gul is a symbol of typical Turkish women: a powerhouse who stands by her man. A kind and gentle mother who keeps her silence until that last drop. But when she is done, she is done for good

The former first lady spoke of her continuing education at Turkey’s renowned Bogazici University and many other topics in an interview with Al-Monitor.

Gul:  Like many other countries, we still have a long and difficult way to go in terms of women’s empowerment. That’s a fact. Despite all the measures taken, women still lack adequate access to educational opportunities. And when women are deprived of education, it’s unrealistic to expect them to participate equally in working life or play an influential role in decision-making in politics and the bureaucracy.

But on this issue, too, I believe in women’s strength. For years, I’ve been telling families — especially mothers, the pillars of families — the following: “Educate your children, especially your daughters. A good education is the most precious inheritance you’ll leave them. Only with education can you prepare them for life and empower them against the hardships they’ll face. By depriving your daughters of education, you leave them vulnerable to all sorts of lifelong exploitation and abuse. Empower them with education.”   Interview with Gul